当前位置:招生动态>正文

SHBS活动|英文辩论赛:得失之辩,思想的火花碰撞 An English Debate on Gains and Losses

来源:上海宏润博源 时间:2024-05-13 08:35


2024年4月29日下午,SHBS英文辩论赛在礼堂举行。本次辩论的题目为“得而复失,还是从未得到更遗憾?”

On the afternoon of April 29, 2024, the SHBS English Debate Competition was held in the auditorium. The topic of this debate was "Is it better to have loved and lost, or never to have loved at all?"


八位准备充分的辩手早已及时就位。双方经过一个多月的有计划的反复练习和对辩,对己方的论点与论据已经倒背如流,自然成竹在胸,斗志昂扬。

The eight well-prepared debaters had already taken their positions in a timely manner. After over a month of meticulously planned rehearsals and debates, they were able to recite their own arguments and evidence fluently, with their confidence soaring high.

主席先向观众们介绍了每方的四名辩手与三名智囊团成员,并对本次辩论赛的全部流程进行总览。之后,辩论赛正式开始!

The chairperson first introduced the four debaters and three advisors from each side to the audience, providing an overview of the entire debate process. Following this, the debate officially commenced!




1

开篇立论

第一个环节是开篇立论。正方一辩选手张同学和反方一辩选手田同学依次发言。正方开篇陈述道“得而复失带来的心理落差的代价是大到不可估量”这一重量级观点;反方也不甘示弱,从成长和情感需求两个角度阐述得而复失并不可悲,反是从未拥有过更加遗憾。双方各抒己见,不分高下。

The first segment is the opening statements. The first debater from the affirmative side, Zhang, and the first debater from the negative side, Tian, delivered their speeches sequentially. Zhang began by asserting the heavyweight viewpoint that "the psychological gap caused by gaining and losing again is immeasurably costly." In response, Tian countered vigorously, elaborating from the perspectives of growth and emotional needs, arguing that having loved and lost is not as regrettable as never having loved at all. Both sides expressed their views passionately, with neither side appearing to have the upper hand.


2

攻击与质询

在第二个环节中,正方二辩宋同学和三辩选手迟同学与反方二辩姜同学和三辩选手谢同学对对方的核心论点进行攻击与质询。正方强调,辩论探讨的场景是普通人在失去心爱事物后的正常反应,并对反方二辩提出海伦凯勒的名言进行回击;而反方三辩则拿出了电影泰坦尼克号和中国历史上项羽乌江自刎的故事,扩大了对遗憾的定义。

In the second segment, the second affirmative debater, Song, and the third debater, Chi, engaged in attacks and cross-examination against the core arguments of the negative side, represented by the second debater, Jiang, and the third debater, Xie. The affirmative side emphasized that the debate scenario pertains to the normal reactions of ordinary individuals after losing something dear, countering the negative side's arguments with a quote from Helen Keller. On the other hand, the negative third debater brought up the stories of the movie Titanic and the historical event of Xiang Yu's self-immolation at the Wu Jiang River, broadening the definition of regret.


3

自由辩论

第三个环节自由辩论是最精彩的部分,将本次辩论推向潮。八位辩手争先恐后,你来我往,唇枪舌剑,好不热闹。各式论据在此交锋:前有心理落差是一生难治愈之瑕疵,珍贵事物在破碎后愈显其价值;后有“我们终将孤独”这一人生终极问题。探讨的问题愈来愈深、愈来愈广,台下评委老师频频点头。同学们时而看看正方的激昂质询,时而扭头听反方的有效回击,场上气氛愈渐焦灼。

The third segment, the free debate, was the most thrilling part, pushing the debate to its climax. The eight debaters eagerly vied with each other, exchanging verbal blows with great fervor and liveliness. Various arguments clashed: on one hand, there was the notion that the psychological gap caused by loss is an incurable flaw throughout one's life, and that precious things become more valuable after they are broken; on the other hand, there was the existential question of "we will eventually be alone." The discussion delved deeper and broader, with the judges nodding frequently in approval. Students alternated between watching the affirmative side's passionate inquiries and turning to listen to the effective counterattacks from the negative side, intensifying the atmosphere on the stage.


4

智囊团发言提问

第四个环节是智囊团发言提问。正反方智囊们为了帮助己方阵营一剑封喉,卯足了劲,绞尽脑汁寻找对面的破绽。

The fourth segment was the presentation and questioning by the advisors. Both sides' advisors exerted themselves to find weaknesses in the opposing camp to deliver a decisive blow.


5

观众提问

第五个环节是观众提问,老师同学们踊跃举手,问出风趣幽默的问题,选手们在回答中金句频出。

In the fifth segment, the audience asked questions enthusiastically, with teachers and students raising their hands to ask witty and humorous questions, prompting the debaters to deliver memorable responses.

最后的结辩也相当精彩。正方四辩黄同学仍保持锐气,一往无前地给出最后一击,反方四辩钟同学不疾不徐地沉着应对正方的进攻压力,在有限的时间内表述出了最完美的逻辑,给观众留下发人深省的思考。

The final rebuttals were equally gripping. The fourth affirmative debater, Huang, maintained his sharpness throughout, delivering the final blow with unwavering determination. On the other hand, the fourth negative debater, Zhong, calmly responded to the affirmative side's pressure, articulating the most perfect logic within the limited time, leaving the audience with profound reflections.



最终,经过投票与计算,正方获得了本次辩论赛的胜利。比赛的结果不重要,重要的是,通过观看这场精彩的辩论赛,同学们领悟到辩论的魅力,在唇枪舌剑中感悟与思考。

In the end, after voting and calculations, the affirmative side emerged victorious in the debate. The outcome of the competition was not as significant as the realization, through watching this exciting debate, of the charm of debating, prompting students to contemplate and reflect amidst the verbal battles.


声明:本文由入驻国际教育网公众平台的作者撰写,观点仅代表作者本人,不代表国际教育网立场。如有侵权或其他问题,请联系举报。